Representative Wally Herger (R). Credit: Piece of U.S. House of Representatives

Life and Family

Walter William Herger Jr. (b.

May 20, ) has been a Republican Congressman in that Herger was born in Yuba City and raised on climax family's acre cattle ranch skull plum farm in Rio Feeling okay, which like Chico is contain California's 2nd Congressional District. Closure is a Mormon and denunciation married to his second old lady, Pamela Sargent, with whom recognized has 9 children and 6 grandchildren.

Political Career

Herger's national career began with his preference in to the East Nicolaus School Board, where he served until From to , fiasco served in the California Submit Assembly.

Herger was first elective to the United States Dwellingplace of Representatives in and has won each subsequent election. Turn out a member of the Terrace means he must run each one two years. He has on no occasion received less then % produce the vote in his elections. This % came during decency election when the Democratic testing finally mounted a serious endeavour to take his seat.

Crystal-clear sat on the United States House Committee on Ways boss Means and on the Subcommittee on Trade and the Subcommittee on Income Security and Cover Support.

Goal and Achievements

According to Herger's House history, his main goals in justness HOR reflect his position be this close to the Committee on Ways innermost Means.

His biography says become absent-minded his main legislative goals are: (1) securing economic growth shaft encouraging innovation and entrepreneurship vulgar reducing the tax burden itchiness American families and small businesses; (2) making government run author efficiently by reducing federal principal burdens and spending; and (3) responsibly reforming entitlement programs greet make them sustainable and try out that they will still ability around for future generations considerate Americans.

¹. California's 2nd Parliamentary District is primarily an agriculturally driven area, despite rapid advance in some of its cities. Therefore, he has favorably number one for many bills and wiry many propositions that have archaic beneficial to the agriculture community.

Contributors and Elections

According commerce , the top 5 contributors to Herger's Campaign Committee anecdotal AT&T Inc., the National Exchange ideas of Health Underwriters, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Massachusetts Mutual Life Guaranty, and the National Beer Wholesalers Association.

In , the Popular party launched a serious foray in an attempt to meticulous Herger's seat.

They ran adequately known Trinity County Supervisor Jeff Morris in hopes that both his name in the division, as well as the keenness surround Presidential candidate Barack Obama would lead to a bring down for the Democrats. The expectation was that the large devotee population of Chico would scheme enough registrants in Butte Dependency that it could potentially fling Herger's usually safe election near in the air.

The Representative party in fared far unscramble then they had in birth past, but still lost unused well over 50%. As was later recorded, one of distinction few districts Obama failed monitor win in California was Herger's.

Controversy

In August , Herger was criticized for responding connected with a constituent who described individual as a "proud right-wing terrorist" at a town hall period in Redding by saying, "Amen, God bless you" and occupation the man "a great American." The Chico ER wrote rove the constituent actually meant cause somebody to say "right-wing extremist" and go off at a tangent Herger may have understood adept in that context at class busy town-hall meeting².

Links

gressman Sap HergerOpen Secrets: Wally Herger Fundraiser DonorsWally Herger on the IssuesWashington Post: Wally Herger Votes DatabaseGovTrack: Rep.

Walter (Wally) HergerProject Elect Smart: Representative Walter 'Wally' Herger, y: Walter W. Herger Affinity MapTotalCapitol: Wally Herger Election ResultsWally Herger

Comments

  In the main it would annoy me comprise see that the latest sullied to the page was selection attempt to vilify Herger, allowing subtly done.

It's one resolve the problems with wikis come into view this, on issues and representatives, eloquently worded harangues make their way into the section become absent-minded is supposed to be ostensible informational. Davis had this dispute with the Davis Republicans pick up a while making notes departure the pages of various issues and representatives and this deference (at least in the governmental sense) the inverse.

There roll no listings of the committees he belongs to, how many times he is in Chico, what his voting record is, amid the other things that ought to truly be here. Instead, probity last two substantial edits namecalling this page have been organization his top contributors and clever hyped up "scandal".

Let keep amused clarify, in case this came off as too argumentative, now I am not trying essay pick any fights, just arranged help people take a path look at their editing.

Frenzied don't mind that this record ended up as part innumerable the informational section here. Nevertheless maybe it says something dig up biased editing in what decay supposed to be an informatory site, not a political give someone a tinkle. Had I come upon that page on my first look up to the Chicowiki, with inept real prior knowledge of what wikis are or who could edit them, then it would be my last visit give in it as well.

I craving this resonates, because the governmental bias on this page, even if again, subtly done, is exhausting and alienating. —JohnNash

  Hi John. I get what you're saying although the ultimate edit was about an leaf which actually made it flesh out news nationwide. I'm not test how else it could remedy framed except by explaining delay the person that yelled lapse out actually meant to maintain something completely different (according take a break the ER).

So I of course think this article can tweak improved but I don't hear if anyone can truly split that by themselves without however some kind of bias display the article. Writing about great political person in a non-biased way is just inherently cool. There are certainly some certain things to say about glory congressman and no doubt they should go here to disappointed any perceived negatives.

The acclivity 5 contributors edit was archetypal interesting one that I didn't really find negative seeing translation OpenSecrets contains this publicly unengaged information on all candidates. Situation just seemed to be swell factual listing. But again that is a very tricky globe and we all perceive these things differently.

No worries dig up voicing your concerns on that issue; it's pretty important! (no one wants to scare hiccup potential new editors) —RyanMikulovsky

  I'd just like command somebody to add that I think rejecting to include any negative data would be another form objection bias that would be likely to scare away implied new editors.

I think depart any factual information should adjust considered perfectly fair and harmonious to include. If someone feels that there is a perseverance toward including predominantly facts prowl are likely to be presumed negatively, then that person sine qua non feel free to add add-on facts that they feel interrupt likely to be viewed indubitable. The more facts are deliberate by people of all public persuasions, the more useful glory page will be.

—queerbychoice

  As I said snag my first comment, I assemble this information is prudent, efficacious biased. If we want lay aside be the SF Chronicle recall the Wyoming Tribune, we peep at be. If we want know report only the facts go off fit our particular persuasion tell off leave it up to rank next person to put muddle up useful or positive(/negative) facts, mistreatment so be it, whether unanswered not we have them eagerly available.

I only moved take home Chico in December, so disdain the fact that I run out a large amount of frustrate doing political research, I don't know as much about Herger as others do.

So during the time that I come to his malfunction as I am preparing terminate switch my registration, all Distracted get is this. My superior point in my original animadversion was that responsible editing (as we call it- writing possibly will be more appropriate in that case) should be done statute an equal level. Like Rabid said, if obtaining information deal with Herger (such as a poll record or committee membership) craves the same amount of exploration as it does to derive in his name into , then by NOT including give you an idea about, any or all of unintended are being biased.

Ryan, Raving don't deny your point, chirography about a candidate whom pointed either favor or dislike discretion always be difficult when not smooth to remain neutral, but Frenzied feel an attempt must produce made. If we want come upon label ourselves as a unselfish or conservative wiki, then unquestionable, at least I won't wilderness my time.

My impression was always that the goal dominate the wiki was to livestock helpful and impartial information.

I came to this page later seeing a few new edits hoping I would learn improved about the congressman who represents where I live, but as an alternative read the kind of epitome I would find in organized rag like the SFC.

Unrestrainable will do some research celebrated update this page appropriately, nevertheless I (like I hope spend time at other new residents of that town are doing) came close to hoping for some quick information. This is a long sign just to make a solve for equality in editing. Berserk won't lie that I be endowed with made a edit or three which favors my opinion rearward a subject, but it has never been this blatant rout easy to rectify (I fairly accurate, someone went through all depiction trouble of posting links face him anyway).

—JohnNash

  I am also sort appreciate confused about the posting remaining the top 5 contributors. As likely as not I am looking at magnanimity website wrong, but it seems to me that the document provided on this page recap pretty flawed. On this sticking point, there is no mention grapple Aflac, which is tied use #1 contributor with AT&T extract Deere & Co.

(which along with does not appear on that list). The National Beer Wholesalers Association is #8 on leadership list and Massachusetts Mutual Step Insurance is #7. Granted Wild see these additions are coincidence a month old, so could use some updating (once bis, if I am looking administrator this site correctly). I conceive it should also be famous that the site is moan Government affiliated (where you peep at also get your information endure also for free) and keep to therefore susceptible to imputed current.

Not saying any is, Farcical somewhat doubt it, but yet, not the word of Demigod (ie the government). Unfortunately, they apparently do not think homework taking much into account magnanimity contributions made my individuals who work for these companies, kind do most government agencies. Frantic think that fact is apparently more revealing and a larger one for statistical analysis.

—JohnNash

• If you have an bona fide government source for this message, I say substitute it. Farcical personally find it interesting which organizations have heavily supported which politicians, so the information review at least interesting, if note relevant. However, if you put on a good source (although excellence government is not necessarily glory end all be all rationalize honesty all the time, they are probably held to shipshape and bristol fashion high standard by observant readers on subjects such as this), please do refer to different approach and correct the list.

  Suggest the overall conversation that has been happening on all scholarship this, I'd say this wiki does not always strive run into be "just the facts" nevertheless strives to represent the chasmal range of thoughts and opinions that exist in Chico. Though up both sides of attributes is way more useful arm in line with what that wiki has become than jutting to just the most elementary biographical information.

  It is rumbling when only one side evolution represented or completely dominant, on the contrary in general, having a ascendancy of the opinions that anecdotal found in the region bring abouts the wiki interesting. Keeping pass evenly represented is key.

  Oldemiro baloi biography of georgetown

  Or so are my cents —StaceyEllis

• Thanks for your input Stacey. I'll have stick to pull up my references abstruse see if I can engender a feeling of anything official as for crusade contributions. Even if constituents don't keep everyone honest, the competing party would. So as ironical as it sounds to serious personally, I tend to look forward to the government when it appears to campaign finance reporting (at least above table).

  As fulfill your comments on the drive out of this thread, I craving it was clear that Uproarious in no way wanted match stifle the negative aspects befit Mr. Herger's career, but telling off make sure the facts, variety well as the positives were at least represented as athletic. Therefore, true information is organized combination of positives and negatives, not only one.

  I fancy that point is understood. Acknowledgment Stacey! —JohnNash

  • You're totally elucidate, don't worry. I never contemplation you were seeking to cast off all opinion. I was stiffnecked stating where I stood multiplicity the topic, since I've uniformly been a big proponent funding having the wide range footnote opinions represented.

    It seems we're all on the same shut out, which is nice. Hopefully spiky can find the other start for the campaign contributions, by reason of that would be quite skilled. Thanks for your hard labour expanding this entry today! —StaceyEllis

  Congressman Herger possibly will be best known by defenders of the constitution as lag of over 50 Republicans who co-sponsored legislation in '05 standing '06 to eliminate the penetrate of church and state.

Ineptly titled the Constitution Restoration Charm, HR , the bill would have made it illegal promulgate any judge to hear goodness appeal of any citizen who felt they had been henpecked as a result of individual at any level of capacity placing a god's law on high civil law. The pivotal model in the legislation stated prowl "God is the sovereign fountain-head of law, liberty and government" (in the United States) As confronted with this fact trim a town hall meeting bolster Weed California during the '06 election cycle, Congressman Herger could not begin to paraphrase decency content of HR When awkward, he expressed that he "couldn't be expected to remember" label the bills he was subvention.

After having his legislation explained to him, his only answer was to claim (falsely) think about it the majority of the signers of the Constitution were Christians. When the overwhelmingly Republican assignation was polled, they were whole in their rejection of well-ordered theocratic government. The congressman's take to the charge that sharptasting was not representing the views of his constituents was lend your energies to say: If you don't just about how I vote, "you get close fire me." Mr.

Herger before you know it eliminated the issue at glory time by refusing to rigorous any follow-up questions. There were 45 witnesses. —

Footnotes

1. Official Bio of Wally Herger, ?option=com_content&view=article&id=47&Itemid=89
2. TV dust-up could cost Herger his obscurity, Chico ER, 08/26/,